One nice thing about writing a blog is getting feedback. While I embrace and benefit from all kinds of feedback, I admit being partial to positive feedback. I get some nice comments from friend on my Facebook page. I love the encouraging comments that get posted here. There is another kind of feedback that is neither positive nor negative, but very informative. It is the kind of feedback that we should all pay attention to. Visitors vote with their mouse (or touchscreen). Every time someone clicks on a blog link, WordPress adds one to a blog page counter. Now that it is 2017, let’s see what the numbers recorded in 2016 tell us.
The most requested page is at the bottom of the graph: How do I know which genes are missing? That is the number one question on parents’ minds. It makes sense. If your car breaks down, you want to know what caused it, even if you don’t know much about cars. At the very least, you have some idea of what needs fixing.
Three more questions are virtually tied for 2nd place. Have you ever met a child like mine? and How to fix SHANK3 are discussions of SHANK3 and its relationship to the other genes of 22q13 deletion syndrome. Together, with the most requested blog page, over one-third (35%) of mouse clicks on this blog are from people who want to understand how all the genes of 22q13 deletion syndrome operate together to produce the disorder. The other blog page that is tied for 2nd place addresses the same topic from the opposite direction: How can the same deletion have such different consequences?
Taken together, nearly half (46%) of the information people want from this blog is to understand what genes are missing and why those genes matter.
Most visitors in 2016 already knew about 22q13 deletion syndrome. Only about 4% of all clicks went to 22q13 deletion syndrome – an introduction. Fewer clicks went to learning about the author. (I can live with that!) But, I think there are a other links that deserve attention. Here is a suggestion for the new year:
Gene deletion versus mutation: sometimes missing a gene is better.
SHANK3 is not the only gene of 22q13 that can have serious consequences when mutated (modified, but not lost altogether). Much is said about SHANK3 mutations, but 98% of people with 22q13 deletion syndrome are missing SHANK3 altogether. Understanding the difference may be crucial to finding cures.
I have dedicated the past few months to formal writing about 22q13 genes aimed at the scientific community. That work has taken me away from this blog, but, hopefully, taken us all closer to effective treatments for our children. That work is done for the moment and I hope to get back to this blog on a more regular basis.
Is 22q13 deletion syndrome a mitochondrial disorder?
Educating children with 22q13 deletion syndrome
How to fix SHANK3Have you ever met a child like mine?
How do I know which genes are missing?
How can the same deletion have such different consequences?
22q13 and the hope of precision medicine
22q13 Deletion Syndrome: hypotonia
Understanding gene size
Gene deletions versus mutations: sometimes missing a gene is better.
Is 22q13 deletion syndrome a ciliopathy?
Understanding translocations in 22q13 deletion syndrome: genetics and evolution
Understanding deletion size
Can 22q13 deletion syndrome cause ulcerative colitis?
Can 22q13 deletion syndrome cause cancer?
22q13 deletion syndrome – an introduction